Matt

William “Matt” Vines has practiced law in Mississippi since 1994. Since being admitted to the bar, his practice has been devoted to litigation, representing clients in a wide spectrum of civil matters, including medical malpractice claims, products liability claims, motor vehicle accident claims, premises liability claims, construction defect claims, and others. He has extensive trial experience in the state and federal courts of Mississippi. He has represented numerous clients before the Mississippi Supreme Court, the Mississippi Court of Appeals, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Good Law Firm Near Me

About

Mr. Vines has received the highest possible peer-review rating (“AV-Preeminent”) by Martindale-Hubbell in both legal ability and ethical standards, reflecting the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. He has also been selected for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America, one of the oldest and most respected peer-reviewed guides to the legal profession in the United States. Mr. Vines holds a J.D. from the University of Mississippi School of Law, an M.A. from Reformed Theological Seminary and a B.A. from Lipscomb University. He is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the state and federal courts of Mississippi. He has served as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Mississippi School of Law teaching civil litigation courses and Belhaven University teaching business law and business ethics courses.

  • Mississippi | 1994

    U.S. Supreme Court | 2018

    U.S. District Court Northern District of Mississippi | 1994

    U.S. District Court Southern District of Mississippi | 1994

    U.S. Court of Appeals 5th Circuit | 1994

    U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit | 2018

  • Universityof Mississippi School of Law | Oxford, MS

    • J.D. | 1994

    • Honors | Phi Delta Phi

    Reformed Theological Seminary | Jackson, MS

    • M.A. | 2018

    Lipscomb Universiy | Nashville, TN

    • B.A. | 1991

  • Pace v. Cirrus Design Corp., 630 F. Supp. 3d 821 | S.D. Miss. 2022

    Mitchell v. Pearl Pub. Sch. Dist., 2022 WL 214087 | S.D. Miss. 2022

    Haynes v. Fed. Ins. Co. et al., 2022 WL 805880 | N.D. Miss. 2022

    Rutland v. Burroughs, 334 So.3d 469 | Miss. Ct. App. 2022

    469 County Road Baldwyn Prop., LLC v. Manchester Anika, 2019 WL 3806376 | N.D. Miss 2019

    Beach v. Crace, 2019 WL 13199580 | S. D. Miss. 2019

    Stone v. Kroger Limited Partnership, LP, 736 Fed. Appx. 513 | 5th Cir. 2018

    Newell v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2016 WL 9414142 | S.D. Miss. 2016

    Gordon v. The Kroger Company, 2016 WL 1047900 | S.D. Miss. 2016

    Shropshire v. The Kroger Company, 2014 WL 5473114 | S.D. Miss. 2014

    Colony Ins. Co. v. Ambling Mgmt. Co, LLC et al, 965 F. Supp. 2d 783 | S.D. Miss. 2013

    Johnson v. Jackson Partners, L.P., et al., 2013 WL 3280351 | S.D. Miss. 2013

    Mehrtens v. America’s Thrift Stores, Inc., 2011 WL 2111085 | S.D. Miss. 2011

    Moore v. M&M Logging, Inc., 51 So. 3d 216 | Miss. Ct. App. 2010

    Pittman v. Dykes Timber Co., Inc., 18 So. 3d 923 | Miss. Ct. App. 2009

    Haycraft v. Mid-State Construction Co., 915 So. 2d 1117 | Miss. Ct. App. 2005

    Certain London Market Ins. Cos. et al v. Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 106 Fed. Appx. 884 (5th Cir. 2004); 269 F. Supp.2d 722 | N.D. Miss. 2003

    Hubbard v. Methodist Conf. of the United Methodist Ch., 138 F. Supp. 2d 780 | S.D. Miss. 2001

    American States Ins. Co. v. Natchez Steam Laundry, Inc., 131 F.3d 551 | 5th Cir. 1998

    Home Builders Assoc. of Miss. v. City of Madison, Miss., et al., 143 F.3d 1006 (5th Cir. 1998); 10 F. Supp. 2d 617 | S.D. Miss. 1997

    Land v. USF&G, 78 F.3d 187 | 5th Cir. 1996

    Jackson v. Miss. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 947 F. Supp. 252 | S.D. Miss. 1996

    Simmons v. USF&G, 675 So. 2d 1284 | Miss. Ct. App. 1995

Mike Osborne

Submit Claim

We hold all conversations in strict confidence. The information submitted does not establish an attorney client relationship without acceptance of the case.